Thursday, December 30, 2004

FTSE4Good Index

It is a basic assumption upon which finance theories and the conceptual framework (Accounting) depend:

Good governance is vital to ensure effective management of a company, improve
its reputation, and maintain the confidence of the financial markets.

And these days reputation is everything. In fact, investors are increasingly concerned about corporation's anti-social behaviour. Environmental sustainability has become a key issue for many small investors. Accounting fraud, embezzlement and negligence don't go down well with investors either. But how do we know? How can small investors like you and I obtain information on a company's social and environmental impact? I mean, this isn't disclosed anywhere. Or is it?
Well good news! It is starting to be disclosed voluntarily by the companies themselves in their financial statements. Yep. There are no disclosure requirements provided by regulatory bodies but we are getting there. Is it a good thing? Look, yes it is more costs for the company. And yes the neutrality of such disclosures is questionable. But like I said, it's a start.
Ever heard of Triple Bottom Line?
But wait, there's better. How about a rating agency ranking companies according to their social and environmental impact? Better still! An index listing socially responsible companies?!
Well for those of us who are concerned about "transparent management" or "socially responsible products" there is the FTSE4Good Index!
Not sure it is approved by Green Peace though.
************************************************************************************
Next post: IMANX, the Dow Jones Islamic Index. Until then take good care.

Monday, December 27, 2004

I Will Be Away

Oh! No!. I will be away for a few days, boys and girls. Mainly working and looking after some business. But I will be ready for more posts next week.

I am also building a new template for my blog. Given that I have no knowledge of HTML and all it is taking me forever.

Sunday, December 19, 2004

More Traffic! More Comments!

Hey hey ... BlogPatrol recorded 20 page views for The Limping Bull! Yahoo! That's good but I hope to get much more traffic. no, what I want more than traffic is comments. I feel like I talk to myself. So if you like my blog (or even if you don't like it) drop me a line or two. And give me your blog's address as well.
It is time for me to get back to my job search. I re-wrote my template cover-letter this afternoon. Let's see if it works. Keep you posted.

The Barons of Bankruptcy


The Barons of Bankruptcy

Now, this is an interesting book with an interesting front page. The picture screams "Cover Your @$$!". When I studied Australian Company Laws at university it seemed to me that directors and other executives could be found liable for the losses of a company when in breach of their duties.
At the time I thought it would be an easy task to catch a negligent or incompetent CEO. Second thought ... maybe not so easy. A lot of them actually get away with a fortune.
If you are interested you should see the Barons of Bankruptcy list. You will see, not what they get away with but how much (in $US million) they get away with.
Some others stand to face the music. Ray Williams who helped building the insurance giant HIH resigned from the board on December 15, 2000, "three months before it crumbled with debts of $5.3 billion". The Australian reported on Thursday that Williams pleaded guilty to a series of charges:
Williams has consistently maintained his innocence but made a
brief appearance in court yesterday to plead guilty to criminal charges of
misleading and "reckless" corporate behaviour.
He now faces up to 12 years' jail for his role in the
country's biggest corporate failure.
12 years! Unless he has a medical condition like Mr Rivkin I recommend he purchases Andy Borowitz's CEO's Guide to Surviving in Prison.

A Guide to Amateur Day Trading ...

... And how to get in debt before you get your first job.

Or maybe amateur day trading isn't so bad. I suppose if you are good you could pay for your studies ... that's if you are good. If you aren't, here is a book you want to read:


Day Trading to Pay University Fees and Become a Trillionaire.

Who Moved My Soap?


Summer/Xmas Reading For Unscrupulous Executives

1,000,000,000,000 copies sold !? ;) Funny. In reality, Mr Borowitz can't expect to get rich with this book. It isn't exactly COEs' favorite topic.
But maybe he's foreseen a future trend. I mean this book is the only guide available for executives facing jail sentences. I am sure you'd find this book under Martha Stewart's pillow if you searched her cell.

Friday, December 17, 2004

The Biggest Resume Blooper of All

Remember Monster.com’s 10 resume bloopers to avoid? Well, you’d better make that 11. And the 11th is the worst of all.

When I started this blog I added the web address to my resume so that employers or recruiters could check what I am up to. Only, I typed the wrong address. I know what you think: ‘It doesn’t matter if the address was wrong. Internet Explorer would display the “This Page is Unavailable” thing. And they will probably think that your blog is down temporarily.’
I thought so too. After all, it was just an extra ‘s’ … you know. Blogspost.com and Blogspot.com … Nothing dramatic, right?!

Well, yesterday when I saw the mistake I clicked the link to see what it would lead to… And then BAM! I was directed to the homepage of some porn web site (Yes. With pictures and all). It wasn’t the most offensive or even explicit site but it surely was enough to upset me. Not that the content made me uncomfortable but that is not exactly the kind of publicity I want associated with my name (… Had enough of that in high school, yeah).

Now I hope no one paid attention to the link in the Personal Details section of my resume. Because if they did, it would explain why I had so few replies over the last week.

I sent apologies to the recruiting agents and the managers to whom I know I had sent the embarrassing link.
And hey, Maybe it will attract attention on me … … I know. I know what you are thinking. I did not type the wrong address on purpose.

So when you send a link to your blog make sure it is the correct address because you could inadvertently be sending your friends, family or boss on some twisted sites instead.

Wednesday, December 15, 2004

You can't raffle off a dead donkey!

"Creative Accounting" you said? Not necessarily a bad thing. People using the Activity Based Costing method can use their creativity to improve costs control and decision making. But if you can't tell that a creative accounting technique breaks the law you can still judge if it right or wrong. Some techniques are just dodgy. Here is a joke that captures theintricacies of the issue:
A city boy, Kenny, moved to the country and bought a donkey from an old farmer for $100.00. The farmer agreed to deliver the donkey the next day.
The next day the farmer drove up and said, "Sorry son, but I have some bad news, the donkey died." Kenny replied, "Well then, just give me my money back."
The farmer said, "Can't do that. I went and spent it already."
Kenny said, "OK then, just unload the donkey."
The farmer asked, "What ya gonna do with him?" "I'm going to raffle him off."
"You can't raffle off a dead donkey!" the farmer said.
"Sure I can. Watch me. I just won't tell anybody he is dead."
A month later the farmer met up with Kenny and asked, "What happened with that dead donkey?"
Kenny said, "I raffled him off. I sold 500 tickets at two dollars apiece and made a profit of $898.00." "Didn't anyone complain?" "Just the guy who won. So I gave him his two dollars back."
So? If you were the auditor of the city boy's firm would you bring his case to the attention of the directors? Even if he offers you generous cut? He didn't hurt anyone really... did he?

Just passing

I am just passing by today. I am writing from the university (still no internet at home - withdrawal symptoms start to appear).
I have so much to do this week because my job applications and other business have to check in with the recipients before they all leave for Xmas holidays.
So far, job hunting hasn't yielded anything. Disappointing it is.
I have to go now.
Merry Christmas & Happy New Year

Sunday, December 12, 2004

Graduate Accountant (Fresh not Cooked)

I am online chatting with a friend right now. We went to several classes together and both graduated last month.
He is just telling me that he went shopping for clothes. Let me tell you I never thought of him as the kind of guy to go around shopping malls trying pants and shoes and all. But he went today because he got a job! Graduate Accountant! I congratulated him. It seemed like he hit the jackpot: landing this kind of job less than two weeks after graduation … that’s ... euh ... excellent.
They just got themselves a Grad fresh from university! Not tainted in any way. Ready for programming. That’s my idea of fresh too. And to be honest I wouldn’t mind being called next week to be told to come down for an interview. If they are into freshness, I got a whole lot for them.
Anyway, that’s for the good news. He is real happy (definitely some celebrating to do this week). That’s good encouragement for me too. Tomorrow, I will get into the hunt with more fervour. Surely going to pay off.

Note: I have no internet connection at home these days. And I can’t go to the university all the time. So there won’t be many posts until at least this week end. Until then … take good care.

Thursday, December 09, 2004

"Get Richest Quickest" ~ Part I

Euh ... I have to apologize for the typos and grammar errors I let through in my previous posts. I hadn't exactly proof-read everything.

Now's test time. Who in the banking and financial services industry get richest quickest?

  • Investment Bankers
  • Hedge Fund Managers
  • Financial Analysis Managers
  • Bank Branch Manager


Well, it seems the Hedge Fund Managers get wealthier faster than other banking & financial services professionals. Hardly a surprise when you consider what a hedge fund is:
A fund usually used by wealthy investors or institutions (because of legal restrictions) which uses aggressive, techniques including selling short, leverage, program trading, swaps, arbitrage and derivatives to offset or reduce the risk associated with an existing investment or group of investments. The keyword here is "aggressive".


Now don't get fooled by the name! Some of these funds do not actually hedge against risk (Hedging being the attempt to reduce risk). In fact, there are different styles of hedge funds who pursue different investment strategies in terms of returns volatility and risk. These funds are called "Hedge Funds" maybe because they are often used by investors as a means to diversify away some risk in a particular portfolio. Or the name prevailed because despite controversy surrounding the $US1 trillion industry , most of these funds do seek to reduce risk.


"Yeah. So what's the problem then?" you will ask. This sounds very much like a mutual fund with a little more liberty to meet investors demands. Well, not exactly.

Continues ...

"Get Richest Quickest" ~ Part II

That's basically where the controversy stems from: Hedge Funds not being required to register these activities (other than those allowed to mutual funds) with regulatory bodies (SEC in the US or APRA & ASIC here in Australia).
The problem requires even more attention given that it concerns a rapidly growing industry (over $AU15 Billion in Australia). Critics of the push for more regulation of the Hedge Funds industry claim that these funds attract the most sophisticated investors who understand the different strategies used and require the highest level of competency. This is the "we can regulate ourselves" argument. And they have a point. Working for demanding institutional investors requires greater skill, knowledge, and talent. "Not surprisingly, the incentive-based performance fees tend to attract the most talented investment managers to the hedge fund industry." as Dion Friedland puts it.
So let's say that most hedge funds are, to a different extent, self-regulated. Good news. But we are talking about $US800 billion to $US1 trillion here. So even a few rogue players can do serious damage to themselves (I mean their investors) and the market. In addition, this argument is coming under fire from regulators who claim that more and more small investors turn to hedge funds. In Australia, access to retail investors was facilitated by low minimum investment (down to $AU2,000). The Reserve Bank of Australia also reports that "more flexible investment conditions, a greater number of hedge funds being rated by fund rating agencies and, associated with this, a growing number of funds appearing on the approved product lists of financial planners" all help bringing hedge funds to retails investors. The central bank also counted "increased advertising and promotional activity aimed at retail investors" as determining factors.
My point is: Can we afford to let hedge fund managers decide of what's best practice?
Continues ...

"Get Richest Quickest" ~ Part III

This is not a question about the professionals' competency but rather an issue about safeguarding smaller investors' interests. It may sound wrong to question the integrity of our hedge fund managers but what we should really think about is what is at stake.
These are issues difficult to address without engendering unease among fund managers. After all the funds would not perform so brilliantly but for the hard work, experience and even talent of managers. But that's not to say either that they should be let alone all together. No one particularly like to have someone (SEC, IRS, APRA or ASIC) standing in our back while we try to do our job. Shareholders and investors do that well enough, some would say. But we've seen enough market disasters to know not to assume all fund managers are rational and risk averse or that we all act with integrity. Given the size of, and the growth experience by the industry is experiencing, can we say that self regulation will keep the boat dry?
See, I am not a great supporter of government intervention. But I believe there is too much at stake here for the industry not to be monitored by a regulatory body. Note that I said, monitored not regulated. I am not ready yet to say that hedge funds must be regulated. Simply because restrictions on their activities may well mean the end of hedge funds. I think hedge funds can make above market returns because they have much more prerogatives than mutual funds for example.
What I am ready to support though is more regulation on speculative hedge funds. But this would require all funds to registers and nominate one or several investments styles. That also seem to defeat the concept of hedge funds.
In the end? Well scrutiny for now until a compromise is found. That's all I can say. I will continue to post on this topic. Because I learn about the hedge funds every day in the news and other readings.
That being said, I am not a professional so the argument I put forward could be fatally flawed. Maybe it is. If you think so then drop me a line or two.

Monday, December 06, 2004

"OSAMA.CAPTURE.JAN05" Futures Contracts

To all finance students,
Graduating or near graduation? If you are like me, you don't have much cash. And you can't afford to put your savings in the stock market. Or simply, you're a bit intimidated. I know how you feel. You've studied finance for three years but still can't tell what to buy to make money.
Well don't worry there is a solution (quite a few in fact): you can trade in all sort of securities, on line and without risking your hard-earned dollars (or giving your credit card details for "free trials"). There are several very good simulation websites where you can test your understanding of market mechanisms. And if you are really serious about trading on the real market then you can still do so without putting in your drinking money.
I am sure you'll find what you want among the following sites:
  • Hollywood Stock Exchange.This is great for cinephiles. You can trade celebrity bonds and film stock and even futures. New releases stocks can be bought at the movie's Initial Public Offering. It's a lot of fun.
  • Foresight Exchange. This site allows members to trade in claims on future events in politics, art, entertainment, science & technology and many other fields. You can buy and sell USNKorea claims (It stands for US attacks North Korea).
  • Tradesports.com. This also a good site. I would register but I am already involved in the Hollywood Stock Exchange. You can even trade OSAMA.CAPTURE.DEC04 claims. Great site!
  • Newsfutures.com. This is similar to foresight Exchange. very interesting.
  • Reuters.com. If you want to trade in real securities, create an account with Reuters.com and you will be able to add securities to a virtual portfolio. (Click "Portfolio" in the menu)
That's it! you are ready to trade. When you go to that big interview you'll impress the board with your fluency with basic trades. Ah ah ah ...
Have fun!

Gut Spread with Terrorism Futures Option ~ Part I

A few weeks ago at work we did a function for JB Were. I wasn't working on that night, thank God. One of my lecturer was there I heard. One tough guy (or at least he wanted us to think so). He did a good job of setting a high standard for the course. He gave us the single hardest assignment I ever had at uni. But I am still very disappointed by his class. It was representative of my whole degree in a way.


I made it through university, learned a great deal about market mechanisms and finance theory. We were fed tons of research papers on CAPM and alternative asset pricing models (you know, multifactor models and all). We were taught Black-Scholes option pricing model. All this based on so many assumptions that at first I thought it was a joke. Ah, and the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). Great stuff too.

But we were rarely told the reality of the Market. We only brushed the idea that actual models are flawed because the assumptions upon which they are based are violated every day. Many of the models we studied are to varying extent reliant on or derived from the CAPM. Now recall some of model's assumptions:

  • Investors are risk averse
  • Investors maximise expected utility of the portfolios over a single period planning horizon
  • Individual investors are price takers
  • Investors are rational mean-variance optimisers
  • Investors have homogeneous expectations


Great stuff. But until now, I am convinced that investors have a tendency to over and under-react to information released. Wait, not only do they over-react but their decisions are affected by non-economic factors (or remotely economically relevant factors). In my opinion, this isn't just a few rogue investors and speculators but rather the large majority of market participants.

Continues ...

Gut Spread with Terrorism Futures ~ Part II

The rise of terrorism to the very mainstream, very public domain is an example. Investors overshoot every time a terrorist attack makes it to the headlines.

The argument here isn't that economic data is not factored into securities prices. Because it is. However, information with little or remote economic consequence is overweighted in investors' decisions.


Look, maybe the collective mind that is the market actually has moods. And because geopolitical elements have such an impact of the Market one could almost predict future events by gauging the mass of all investors’ sentiment. How about that? Yes, I know: it’s a stretch. But wait, wait. Before you dismiss this whole post as ridiculous add a touch of inside information that circulates in certain classes of investors. The Pentagon thought it was a good theory.
They came up with “Terrorism Futures” to help predict terrorist strikes. The scheme was aborted a day after the proposal was made public. The Policy Analysis Market (PAM) program would allow individuals to invest money on the probability of terrorist attacks. No wonder it was a short-lived plan. Can you imagine adding Terrorism Futures to your portfolio? That's certainly volatile material. Speculators and gamblers would have loved it. But the Senate wasn't impressed. It is a very sinister idea; particularly coming from a government agency.

Now putting the moral issue aside, I can't help admiring the initiative. They went to the trouble of elaborating a trading program for the grotesquely-named scheme. It was a good idea. Actually, I should say it would have been an interesting experiment. The results could have proved something about investors behaviour. Indeed the fact that they seriously considered implementing such a plan demonstrates that the Market is thought to capable of sensing or foreseeing major events.

Do you think the Market sensed 9/11 attacks?

I know. This is rather sinister but it shows that there is much more at work than Beta, risk free rate and market return. University could have done more to develop student critical view of finance.


Sunday, December 05, 2004

Can I Buy Your Broken Leg, Champion?

I can still see myself, two years ago, sitting in a theatre listening to my lecturer talking about China's Non-Performaing Loans (NPLs).
The class was "Asia-Pacific Capital Markets" and at the time, I got the impression that the NPLs plaguing the Chinese banking sector was an omnipresent threat to the sustainability of the country's 7% growth. The discussions in class were dominated by this question:

How is China going to fix its Non-Performing Loans problem before it comes in direct conflict with the liberalisation reforms?

In fact, China joined the World Trade Organisation on January 1st 2002, after 15 years of marathon negotiations. In doing so the country accepted to implement reforms targeting the dinosaur State Owned Entreprises (SOEs), the telecom, insurance and the banking sector. China's Special Economic Zones (SEZ) were seen as a showcase of China's future as a major player on the WTO.
The Special Economic Zones Hainan Province, Shantou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai and Xiamen cities started as "experiments" indeed. And after little more than 20 years existence they have accomplished miracles:

China's WTO membership was bundled with a host of market access measures to be implemented. The package-deal require the country to open-up to foreign investment sectors of the economy dominated by SOEs. Privatisation: the ticket to free markets and economic prosperity.

Only the level of Non-Performing Loans of the SOEs and the banks worked to keep risk-adverse investors away from Chinese heavy industries (together with the CCP's reluctence to privatise pillar industries).

Now, foreign investors have so much confidence that the Chinese miracle is not a mirage that they start buying the country's NPLs! Two years ago I would have never thought that anyone would spend a penny purchasing loans that probably won't be repaid. Worst, I never thought that Chinese Central power would allow this to happen.

Now I am confused. I was first puzzled when Patricia Cheng, from the Sydney Morning Herald wrote:

"Foreigners want China's bad debts"

Why would this be? I mean there clearly is an investment opportunity here but the risks associated with it should be a major discouragement for foreign investors. At least it ought to be the case if we are talking about a few institutions buying large chunks of the Chinese banks and Asset MAngement Companies (ACMs). No? The CCP has far too much influence on the approval process for this to worth the risk. And at what discount rate? 7%? Come on.

But as I read William Pesek Jr's column for Bloomberg News I understood why Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have bought more than $US4 billion of distressed assets. The column is titled "The Next Great China Gold Rush -- Dodgy Debt". "Gold Rush" captures quite well the nature of the phenomenon, in my opinion. Pesek writes this:

"[...] investors are scrambling to get in on the next Chinese gold rush: More than $450 billion of bad loans held by China's four-biggest commercial banks and their asset management companies. The hope is to buy dodgy loans at a fraction of
their face value and sell the assets at a profit as the world's fastest-growing
major economy expands
."

But what about transparency? The Chinese government is not exctly the most transparent when it comes to its crippled banking sector.

There are also reports that the Government issued rules to facilitate the sale of bad loans to foreigners? Despite what credit rating agencies say (that this sale of bad loans is going much too slow) I still think no one should rush. Let's not make this another disaster 98-Asian Crisis style where everyone runs in because the saw that big boys go. Looking at the fundamental picture, China still is largely, if not entirely, underdevelopped in terms of its financial sector's infrastructures and framework. It is maybe too early to literally "rush in".

Recall that crony capitalism still runs wild in the ranks of Chinese officials and business people. Quick sale of Non performing loans is a good way from many to get out of trouble rich.

Anyway, I am just a grad. Maybe I'll understand the situation better later.

These days I am doing a bit of research on Corporate risk management. You know? Hedge funds and all. Well, there too I think wierd things happen. I'll keep you posted.

Saturday, December 04, 2004

Resume Bloopers to Avoid

Final results were published yesterday. I did well. I scored a Credit in Econometrics. Yahoo! It was actually the most challenging subject of my degree. And I am quite proud of my grade.
For those of you who wonder, econometrics can be seen as the mathematical modeling of economic relationships. For example, we all know that there is an positive relationship between household income and household expenditure. But this economic theory does not specify the magnitude or significance of this relationship. In fact, an econometric model allows us to measure the impact that a change in income has on household expenditure.
But that's not the point of this post.
I intensified my efforts to find a job after I got the results. And I thought a complete revamp of my resume was in order. There is always room for improvement. So I surfed about for resume-writing tip. And I found some very useful advise. Monster.com, for example, warned against 10 classic resume bloopers ("classic" here is an overstatement but "bloopers" certainly captures dumb nature of the mistakes ). Here are a few not-so-classic real-life resume blunders:
"Directed $25 million anal shipping and receiving operations." Either this person is showcasing compulsively stubborn management qualities, or he has a challenging product packaging/storage problem.
"Experienced supervisor, defective with both rookies and seasoned professionals." Many of us have had a boss like this at some point in our careers, but you usually don't find them being so up-front about their leadership inadequacies.
"Consistently tanked as top sales producer for new accounts." Sales managers aren't likely to be impressed with this self-proclaimed underachiever.
"Dramatically increased exiting account base, achieving new company record." If customer accounts were leaving in droves as this statement implies, it's probably fair to assume that this candidate also tanked as a top sales producer.
Monster.com is a web-based job search engine. They surely process thousands of applications a day. So when they call these bloppers the Classic Ten, I am worried for the other 9,990x applications. One thing is sure: these guys must have a blast at work, reading stuff like this.
Wait here is one who doesn't want to find a job. Career Objective section reads:
"Internship at a growing, reputable company bent on world domination, or similarly grand aspirations. Preferably in a business-oriented role, while working near the latest and greatest technology.
A friendly environment, with crazy ideas and having fun being the norm. Ideally
located somewhere with warm, gentle ocean-front weather
. "
This will certainly get the attention of the manager. But I don't think the guy will get the interview.
Ok, I am going to work now. Be back tonight. Until then, take care.

Friday, December 03, 2004

Some Crude Mood Swings

"The All Ordinaries Index lost four points to 3,951. The benchmark ASX 200 was off two points to 3,940. Dragging the market down was an overnight fall in commodity prices. Oil is now at a three-month low of $US43 a barrel." ABC News
$US43 a barrel? What happened to the "terror premium"? Now most analysts and experts explain this sharp fall as being the results of higher-than-expected crude oil, gasoline and petroleum distillate inventories. The data released by the Energy Information Administration helped dissipating concerns about short term supply levels.
So the Market is working fine. Participants reacted instantly to the new information made available by the EIA. What a re-adjustment! But, hey, Market is at least semi-strong form of efficiency, right? So info comes in, it is assessed by the rational investors and builds up in the price shortly after. So again, what happened to the "terror premium"? Disappeared? Or is it the $15-$20 above the $30-$35 long-term price estimate?
And is $US50 the resistence level or should we tell investors that there is an attack on pipelines and refineries almost every day in Iraq?
I came across an article on Aljazeera's website where they questioned the relationship between oil prices, economic theories, politic and of course the theme du jour, terrorism. It was an interesting piece I should say. The author, Adam Porter, claims that the theory of "Terror Premium" may well be unfunded. In fact, if it was, oil prices could and would rise well above the $US50 mark.
So S&P 500 Index' three year high record makes sense. Remember: "markets rise because of oil price falls, oil prices fall as the markets rise". Remember? No? Well, the Washington Times explained the concept quite well when Patrice Hill sais that the latest fall in oil prices is good news for retails stocks. Us consumers do not seem to be overly bothered by high energy prices as evidenced by 0.7% consumer spending increase in October. So they should be even happier if oil prices start to tumble down. And happy spending consumers means good news for the stock market.
You must have realised by now that I am confused. It is late. I'll think about it at work tomorrow. Until then take care.